Dating the gospel of mark Teluguchatsite com
This can be shown by comparing Mark , which says: But when you see the abomination of desolation standing where it should not be (let the reader understand), then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains with Matt -16: Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains. D.), bishop of Hierapolis, wrote that Matthew collected the oracles in the Hebrew language, and each interpreted them as best he could.
(The two-source theory stipulates that Matthew and Luke drew from the gospel of Mark and a second source of Jesus sayings, usually designated as "Q").Of the 661 verses in Mark, Matthew reproduces 606 of them and Luke reproduces 320 of them.Of the 55 verses in Mark but not Matthew, 31 are present in Luke.[William Barclay, The Gospel of Mark, pp.D., then we would have good reason for believing that they were written by the disciples of Jesus Himself.
If they were written by the disciples, then their reliability, authenticity, and accuracy are better substantiated.Also, if they were written early, this would mean that there would not have been enough time for myth to creep into the gospel accounts since it was the eyewitnesses to Christ's life that wrote them. when the Romans sacked Jerusalem and burned the Temple. 65),"1 and we have further evidence that it was written very early and not long after Jesus' ascension into heaven. He was a companion of Paul who also was not an eyewitness of Christ's life. The date of Acts is still in dispute, but the early date (about A. 63) is gaining support constantly."9 The writer of the gospel of John was obviously an eyewitness of the events of Christ's life since he speaks from a perspective of having been there during many of the events of Jesus' ministry and displays a good knowledge of Israeli geography and customs.