States mandating coverage for invitro fertilization justin beiber dating
This is not just a question of how people are born but of the whole ethos of family life in society.
No serious social science research disputes that children need intact families to develop normally; but the current American approach to family policy avoids engaging with that truth.
The most cursory survey of the American mass media in July 2014 would have you believe that millions of women are being denied basic medical care and fundamental rights are under total assault because … Senate—whose legislative productivity this year suggests it has been the victim of an Obamacare death panel—managed to rush a bill overturning given us a glimpse of Hobby Lobby II?
they can’t get somebody else to buy their abortifacients. The July 26 issue carries a story whose gist is that government and private insurance does not adequately cover in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Deliberately making an orphan, i.e., a child bereft of a mother and father, is in principle what IVF does.
But IVF has nothing to do with children, except as products manufactured according to parental desires. As Zbigniew Stawrowski notes in his new book, , today’s “sleek barbarians” use the language of tradition (“liberty,” “justice”) to create a new ethic where the strong gain the force of law to effect their desires on the weak, in this case, children.
Montana This state's law requires health maintenance organizations (Blue Cross Blue Shield is the only one in Montana) to cover infertility services as part of basic preventive health care services.
The law does not define infertility or the scope of services covered; nor did the state ever draft regulations explaining what infertility services entail.